[../flint-ip-law-backup/index.htm]
[../flint-ip-law-backup/aboutme.htm]
[../flint-ip-law-backup/about-patents.htm]
[../flint-ip-law-backup/what-you-can-patent.htm]
[../flint-ip-law-backup/how-to-get-a-patent.htm]
[../flint-ip-law-backup/about-trademarks.htm]
[../flint-ip-law-backup/strong-trademarks.htm]
[../flint-ip-law-backup/trademark-registration-and-enforcement.htm]
[../flint-ip-law-backup/about-copyrights.htm]
[../flint-ip-law-backup/about-domain-names.htm]
[../flint-ip-law-backup/about-trade-secrets.htm]
[../flint-ip-law-backup/interesting-ip-facts.htm]
[../flint-ip-law-backup/contact-information.htm]
[./_tn_legal_information.htm]
[http://www.eff.org/cases/re-bilski]
[mailto:flintiplaw@att.net]
[Web Creator] [LMSOFT]
Copyright 2009 Nancy J. Flint, Attorney At Law, P.A.  All rights reserved.  For legal information about this site, click hereNothing on this web site is legal advice to anyone, including you, and no attorney client-relationship is formed with anyone by virtue of the content on this Web site.
Contact me for a free consultation on how to avoid mistakes that could put your rights in your ideas and inventions at risk!

Patent protection exists for "anything under the sun that is made by man."  There are exceptions to this and a court recently issued a decision that may affect the validity of many issued so-called "business method" patents. 

A recent decision by a federal court has set forth certain requirements for patents that may not be met by already-issued "business method" patents which could make them invalid. This decision is going to be review by the U.S. Supreme Court.

  

For an invention to be patented, it must be something more than just new, or "novel."  It must also satisfy the legal requirements of "utility" and "non-obviousness."

Additionally, the disclosure or "specification" of the application must set sufficient disclosure to meet the "written description," "enablement" and "best mode" requirements.

Contact me to review these requirements with you about your invention.